About 3,000 years from healing hymns and palm-leaf texts to a ministry, a WHO centre and fair trials.
Ayurveda grew out of healing hymns, wandering physicians and Buddhist monasteries, and was written down in great Sanskrit compilations about 2,000 years ago. Physicians copied, argued over and added to those texts for centuries, and carried them to Baghdad, Central Asia and Europe. Colonial rule pushed it to the margins; Indian vaidyas, colleges and later the government revived it. In the 20th century one of its plants gave the world a blood-pressure drug, and scientists began asking the same question of the rest: what works, and is it safe?
Oldest surviving physical Ayurvedic manuscript (among the oldest)
Bower Manuscript, Kucha
c. 13th–14th century
Earliest clear account of pulse diagnosis
Sharangadhara Samhita
1949
Often called the first clinical trial from India
R. J. Vakil, Mumbai
9 November 2014
First ministry for traditional medicine in India
Ministry of AYUSH
2022
First WHO global centre for traditional medicine
Jamnagar, Gujarat
c. 1200–900 BCE (dates debated)Hymns and wandering healers
1500 BCE – 200 BCE
Hymns and wandering healers
Healing hymns in the Atharvaveda, and physicians around the early Buddhist monasteries. Dates are uncertain and debated.
1100 BCE
c. 1200–900 BCE (dates debated)
Healing hymns of the Atharvaveda
Vedic poetsNorth-west India
The Atharvaveda holds charms and hymns against fever, cough, wounds and snakebite, and names healing plants. Ayurveda calls itself an upaveda, an offshoot, of the Vedas. Its dates are uncertain, and historians see Ayurveda’s later, systematic ideas as coming from many sources.
Why it mattered. It is the oldest Indian text with a large body of healing lore.
Buddhist texts tell of Jivaka, who studied medicine for seven years at Takshashila and became physician to the Buddha and King Bimbisara. The stories were written down centuries later, so they are legend as much as history.
Why it mattered. They show that physicians trained with teachers and cared for monks in the Buddha’s time.
Ashoka’s second rock edict says he arranged medical care for people and for animals, and had medicinal herbs, roots and fruit planted and brought in where they did not grow.
Why it mattered. It is one of the earliest records of a state providing medical care.
The Charaka and Sushruta Samhitas grow in layers, Vagbhata sums them up, and monastery universities teach medicine.
100 BCE
compiled c. 100 BCE–200 CE; revised by Dridhabala c. 5th–6th century CE
The Charaka Samhita
Attributed to Charaka, after Agnivesha; completed by DridhabalaNorth-west India
The great text of internal medicine: 120 chapters on the three doshas, diet, diagnosis, medicines and the qualities of a good physician. It was compiled in layers, and the version we read today includes a later revision.
Why it mattered. It set out the ideas that Ayurveda still teaches, from tridosha to prakriti.
layers from the last centuries BCE, completed c. 300–500 CE
The Sushruta Samhita and early surgery
Attributed to SushrutaVaranasi (by tradition)
A surgical text of 186 chapters. It describes over a hundred instruments, has students practise cuts on gourds and dead animals, and gives the first written account of rebuilding a nose with a flap of skin from the cheek.
Why it mattered. Its rhinoplasty method is still recognised in the history of plastic surgery.
Nalanda grew into a great Buddhist centre of learning from about the 5th century. Visiting Chinese monks, among them Yijing in the 7th century, wrote about the medicine they saw practised in India; medicine was one of the subjects studied, though the details are uncertain.
Why it mattered. Monasteries helped carry Indian medicine along the Silk Road to Central Asia, Tibet and China.
Found by Lt Hamilton Bower; read by Rudolf HoernleKucha, Xinjiang
Birch-bark pages buried in a Buddhist stupa on the Silk Road hold Sanskrit medical texts, including a manual called the Navanitaka and a treatise on garlic. Hoernle, working in Calcutta, deciphered them between 1893 and 1912.
Why it mattered. It is among the oldest surviving physical manuscripts of Indian medicine.
Vagbhata combined the teachings of Charaka and Sushruta into one clear text in verse, organised around the eight branches. It became the main textbook in Kerala and was translated into Tibetan.
Why it mattered. It is still one of the most studied Ayurvedic texts today.
Translations in Baghdad, new texts on diagnosis, pulse and pharmacy, and Kerala physicians behind a famous European botany book.
700
c. 7th–8th century CE
A book of diagnosis
MadhavakaraIndia
The Madhava Nidana gathered the signs and causes of diseases, chapter by chapter, into one book on diagnosis (nidana). Later physicians used it as the standard reference.
Why it mattered. It made diagnosis a subject of its own in Ayurveda.
At the Abbasid court, the Sushruta Samhita was translated into Arabic as the Kitab Shah Shun al-Hindi, and Charaka’s text was translated too. Indian physicians worked in Baghdad’s hospitals.
Why it mattered. Indian medicine fed into the Greek-Arabic tradition that became Unani medicine (see UnaniClear).
The Sharangadhara Samhita standardised recipes for powders, decoctions and pills, and gave the earliest clear account of nadi pariksha, reading the pulse. Charaka and Sushruta do not describe pulse diagnosis as a method.
Why it mattered. Pulse reading, now seen as typical of Ayurveda, is a later addition.
The Bhavaprakasha added plants that had recently arrived in India and described phiranga roga, the “Frankish disease” (syphilis), brought by European sailors.
Why it mattered. It shows Ayurveda changing to meet new plants and new diseases.
Itty Achuden, with Hendrik van RheedeKochi, printed in Amsterdam
The Ezhava physician Itty Achuden dictated in Malayalam what his family’s palm-leaf manuscripts said about the plants of Malabar, checked by the Konkani physicians Ranga Bhat, Vinayaka Pandit and Appu Bhat. The Dutch governor van Rheede had it published with 794 copper engravings.
Why it mattered. Indian healers’ plant knowledge became a founding book of tropical botany.
Colonial rule favours Western medicine; vaidyas found pharmacies and colleges; a Kolkata kaviraj studies sarpagandha.
1835
28 January 1835
Colonial rule closes the Ayurveda classes
Government of Bengal (Bentinck)Calcutta (Kolkata)
The Native Medical Institution (1822) had taught Ayurveda at the Sanskrit College and Unani at the Madrasa alongside Western medicine. A government order ended these classes, and the new Medical College taught only Western medicine.
Why it mattered. For the next century Ayurveda survived outside official support, in families, pathshalas and pharmacies.
P. S. Varier opened a small clinic and pharmacy that grew into one of India’s largest Ayurvedic hospitals and medicine makers. Across India, vaidyas founded colleges and associations to revive the system.
Why it mattered. Standard, factory-made medicines and colleges shaped modern Ayurveda.
The Ayurvedic physician Gananath Sen and the doctor Kartick Chandra Bose reported that powdered Rauvolfia serpentina root calmed disturbed patients and lowered blood pressure. The same year the chemist Salimuzzaman Siddiqui isolated its first alkaloids.
Why it mattered. It started the path from a traditional herb to a modern drug.
Reserpine, laws and regulators, the Ministry of AYUSH, safety studies, and a WHO centre in Jamnagar.
1949
Vakil’s trial in Mumbai
Rustom Jal VakilMumbai
The cardiologist R. J. Vakil published a study of 50 patients with high blood pressure given Rauwolfia tablets for four weeks in the British Heart Journal. Most had a clear fall in blood pressure.
Why it mattered. Often called the first clinical trial from India, it caught the world’s attention.
Johannes Müller, Emil Schlittler and Hugo Bein, CibaBasel
Chemists isolated the pure alkaloid reserpine from the root. It became one of the first modern drugs for high blood pressure and for severe mental illness. Its side effects, including depression, later made it rare.
Why it mattered. Reserpine research helped Arvid Carlsson show dopamine’s role in the brain, work that won the 2000 Nobel Prize.
The Act created the Central Council of Indian Medicine to set standards for Ayurveda, Siddha and Unani education and to keep a central register of qualified practitioners.
Why it mattered. It made BAMS a regulated degree with national standards.
The Central Council for Research in Indian Medicine and Homoeopathy (1969) split into separate councils. The Ayurveda one became today’s CCRAS, which runs clinical studies, drug standards and plant surveys.
Why it mattered. It gave Ayurveda a national research body.
India created a Department of Indian Systems of Medicine and Homoeopathy in 1995. In 2003 it was renamed AYUSH, for Ayurveda, Yoga and Naturopathy, Unani, Siddha and Homoeopathy.
Why it mattered. Traditional systems got a dedicated place in national health policy.
Tests found potentially harmful lead, mercury or arsenic in 14 of 70 Ayurvedic products from Boston shops. A 2008 study of 193 products sold online found metals in about 1 in 5, and in about 4 in 10 metal-based rasa shastra products.
Why it mattered. It made product safety a global concern.
Ayurveda Day is held on Dhanvantari Jayanti. The first one focused on diabetes, and in 2017 the All India Institute of Ayurveda in New Delhi was dedicated to the nation on the same day.
Why it mattered. It gave Ayurveda a yearly national spotlight and a flagship institute.
The National Commission for Indian System of Medicine Act replaced the Central Council of Indian Medicine with a new regulator for education and practice, including a national exit test for new graduates.
Why it mattered. It modernised how Ayurvedic doctors are trained and registered.
25 March 2022 (agreement); 19 April 2022 (ground-breaking)
A WHO centre in Jamnagar
WHO and the Government of IndiaJamnagar, Gujarat
The World Health Organization and India agreed to set up the WHO Global Centre for Traditional Medicine, backed by US$250 million from India, to study traditional medicine from around the world with modern science.
Why it mattered. The first global WHO centre for traditional medicine puts evidence and safety at its heart.
The first all-India survey on AYUSH, of over 1.8 lakh households, found that about 46% of rural and 53% of urban people had used AYUSH to prevent or treat illness in the past year. Ayurveda was the most used.
Why it mattered. It shows how many Indian families rely on these systems, which is why fair tests and safety matter.